Contents
AI Visibility Scan · automated · August 21, 2026
What the AIs say about Mailchimp
When buyers ask AIs about email marketing platforms, Mailchimp is recommended in 124 of 200 answers, and its own pages are cited as a source in 30.
The name the engines recommend most in these answers is Klaviyo, in 110 of 200.
There are 10 questions where you are already the recommendation; they are below, with how to widen them.
AI Visibility Score
51/100
Out of every 100 AI answers to buyer questions in your market, Mailchimp is named in about 78 and picked as a recommendation in about 62.
One 0–100 score, blending how often the engines pick you, how often they mention you, your share of the recommendations against rivals, and the tone when you are named. How it is scored.
78%
Mention rate
answers that mention you
16%
Share of voice
vs Klaviyo 14%
#1
Rank
of 13 in the field · see them →
30%
Sentiment
positive tone when named
Brand strength vs top rivals
bar is you · tick is the top-rivals average
8 AI engines · 200 answers · August 21, 2026 · how we measured
Start here
What to do Monday morning
The three highest-impact actions from your plan. The full ordered list, with the why behind each, is below.
01
Publish a dedicated page titled 'Is Mailchimp Worth It for a Small Business?' answering directly with pricing, features, and limitations.
a day or two02
Publish a comparison page titled 'Mailchimp vs Klaviyo for Ecommerce' with a clear feature/price table addressing.
a day or two03
Publish a page titled 'Best Email Marketing Software for Ecommerce Stores' covering automation, segmentation, and integrations to target.
a day or two
Since last run
This is run 1, so there is nothing to compare yet.
Run 2 fills this in. Weekly tracking re-runs this exact scan and keeps every run under this link, so the work you do next has a before and after. Start tracking
Chapter one
Where you stand
Your position, how sure we are of it, and who is ahead.
Where you stand
Recommended, cited, or absent
How often the AIs recommend you, vs the leader
Mailchimp: 62.0 percent (124 of 200), with a 95% interval from 55.1 to 68.4 percent. Klaviyo: 55.0 percent.
You are ahead of Klaviyo by more than the wiggle in your own number, so the lead is real. Their rate moves run to run too, so treat its exact size as approximate. The faint band behind your bar is where your true rate plausibly sits given 200 answers.
#1
of 13 names ranked
124
Recommended / 200
30
Cited as source / 200
155
Mentioned / 200
30% positive tone
Across 152 answers naming you: 45 positive · 93 neutral · 14 negative
Two different ways to exist in an AI answer: recommended means the engine names you as a pick; cited means the engine used your own pages as a source while answering, whoever it named. Absent is neither. Cited without recommended is common and fixable: the engines already trust your content, they just do not connect it to the pick.
- MailchimpyouRecommendedrecommended 124 · cited 30 · mentioned 155 of 200
Your beachheads
Where you already show up
Questions where an engine already recommends Mailchimp today. Part of this scan is a set of long-tail discovery probes built to find exactly these pockets.
You are recommended for “best email marketing software for startups” on ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Perplexity.
You are recommended for “best free email marketing platform for small business” on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Grok.
You are recommended for “Mailchimp vs Klaviyo for ecommerce” on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Grok.
You are recommended for “who should I use for email and sms marketing as a small business” on ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Perplexity.
You are recommended for “best ai-powered email marketing tool” on ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Claude and Perplexity.
You are recommended for “best email marketing automation tool for beginners” on Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to ChatGPT and Claude.
You are recommended for “best email marketing platform for nonprofits” on ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Perplexity and Gemini.
You are recommended for “best email marketing platform for small businesses” on Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to ChatGPT and Claude.
You are recommended for “best email marketing tool with lead generation features” on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to Gemini and DeepSeek.
You are recommended for “best reporting and analytics tool for email campaigns” on Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI).
You already have this answer on Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral and Llama (Meta AI). A page on your own site that answers this question directly, in the same words a buyer uses, is how a pocket like this spreads to ChatGPT and Claude.
The leaderboard
Klaviyo takes 14% of recommendations. You take 16%.
Every name the engines recommended or mentioned across all 200 answers, ranked. This is the real field you compete with inside AI answers; your row is highlighted wherever it falls.
- 01Mailchimpyourec 124 · cited 30
- 02Klaviyorec 110 · cited 20
- 03Brevorec 105 · cited 23
- 04ActiveCampaignrec 101 · cited 14
- 05MailerLiterec 77 · cited 11
- 06HubSpotrec 65 · cited 9
- 07Omnisendrec 49 · cited 10
- 08ConvertKitrec 33 · cited 0
- 09Constant Contactrec 33 · cited 30
- 10GetResponserec 20 · cited 9
Show the other 3 names
- 11Driprec 19 · cited 0
- 12Moosendrec 19 · cited 8
- 13Campaign Monitorrec 19 · cited 8
Market intelligence
The shape of the market as the AI engines describe it — structure, positioning, and where to move.
Is this market winnable?
How concentrated AI's recommendations are across the field.
Wide open: no one dominates, and it takes 4 names to reach half of all recommendations.
Do this: this market is winnable on consistency. Claim the undefended questions before a rival consolidates them.
Chapter two
Who wins what
The field, engine by engine, and the ground nobody holds yet.
How you are described
Being named is one thing; what is said once you are named is another. Every sentence below is quoted verbatim from an answer.
No answer in this scan described Mailchimp strongly enough to classify. That happens when a brand gets named in passing without any judgement. Winning more recommendations gives the engines something to say about you.
The landscape
Every winner, and how to take their ground
What the AIs did with each rival in this scan, measured August 21, 2026: where they get recommended, the question types and engines that never surface them, and the sources their picks travel with. Every figure is an observation of the engines' answers on the scan date, not a judgment of the company. Each card ends with your opening: the contested ground you can take.
Klaviyo
110 recommendations
- Where AI backs them
- other questions (66), best-of questions (23)
- Pages cited
- 20 answers drew on their site
Their picks travel with: klaviyo.com, emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com
Your opening: Its picks travel with citations of klaviyo.com, emailtooltester.com and emailvendorselection.com; presence on the same sources contests them directly.
Brevo
105 recommendations
- Where AI backs them
- other questions (50), best-of questions (41)
- Where AI doesn't
- comparison — 0 of the 8 answers there
- Pages cited
- 23 answers drew on their site
Their picks travel with: emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com, constantcontact.com
Your opening: Weakest on comparison questions: the engines made 8 recommendations there and this name took 0. Its picks travel with citations of emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com and constantcontact.com; presence on the same sources contests them directly.
ActiveCampaign
101 recommendations
- Where AI backs them
- other questions (63), best-of questions (28)
- Where AI doesn't
- comparison — 0 of the 8 answers there
- Pages cited
- 14 answers drew on their site
Their picks travel with: emailtooltester.com, ventureharbour.com, constantcontact.com
Your opening: Weakest on comparison questions: the engines made 8 recommendations there and this name took 0. Its picks travel with citations of emailtooltester.com, ventureharbour.com and constantcontact.com; presence on the same sources contests them directly.
MailerLite
77 recommendations
- Where AI backs them
- best-of questions (38), other questions (29)
- Where AI doesn't
- comparison — 0 of the 8 answers there
- Pages cited
- 11 answers drew on their site
Their picks travel with: emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com, sequenzy.com
Your opening: Weakest on comparison questions: the engines made 8 recommendations there and this name took 0. Its picks travel with citations of emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com and sequenzy.com; presence on the same sources contests them directly.
HubSpot
65 recommendations
- Where AI backs them
- other questions (43), best-of questions (17)
- Where AI doesn't
- comparison — 0 of the 8 answers there
- Pages cited
- 9 answers drew on their site
Their picks travel with: emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com, sequenzy.com
Your opening: Weakest on comparison questions: the engines made 8 recommendations there and this name took 0. Its picks travel with citations of emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com and sequenzy.com; presence on the same sources contests them directly.
Omnisend
49 recommendations
- Where AI backs them
- other questions (33), best-of questions (12)
- Where AI doesn't
- comparison — 0 of the 8 answers there
- Pages cited
- 10 answers drew on their site
Their picks travel with: emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com, ventureharbour.com
Your opening: Weakest on comparison questions: the engines made 8 recommendations there and this name took 0. Its picks travel with citations of emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com and ventureharbour.com; presence on the same sources contests them directly.
Sources
20 domains feed these answers. Yours is one of them.
Every engine in this scan browsed with live web search, and 114 of the 200 answers cited sources. These are the domains the engines drew on, across all engines, with your own domain flagged where it appears. Getting onto this list is how you enter the answers.
Your own pages
1 · days
The engines already read you here. Answer more of the buyer questions on these pages, in the words buyers use.
A rival's own site
6 · months
You cannot get listed on a competitor. What you can do is take the questions it wins, which the prompts page names one by one.
Get reviewed
2 · weeks
Claim the profile, then ask real customers. Review volume and recency are the strongest lever anyone has measured.
Take part
1 · weeks
Communities where being useful is the price of being named. Answer questions in your subject; do not advertise.
Pitch it
10 · months
Editorial pages with a writer behind them. You need an angle and a person, not a submission form.
- emailtooltester.comPitch it55 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- emailvendorselection.comPitch it45 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
- sequenzy.comPitch it42 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- reddit.comTake part36 citations · ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok
- mailchimp.comyour site35 citations · ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- constantcontact.comA rival's own site30 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- ventureharbour.comPitch it30 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
- insiderone.comPitch it26 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
- sender.netPitch it26 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- brevo.comA rival's own site25 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- klaviyo.comA rival's own site22 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- zapier.comPitch it20 citations · Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- mailtrap.ioPitch it17 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
- activecampaign.comA rival's own site14 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- learn.g2.comGet reviewed13 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- mailerlite.comA rival's own site12 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini
- omnisend.comA rival's own site12 citations · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini
- capterra.comGet reviewed11 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
- encharge.ioPitch it11 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
- mailercloud.comPitch it11 citations · Claude, Perplexity, Grok
Chapter three
How you are seen
Which buyers reach you, how the answers describe you, and what the engines really searched.
Chapter four
Your own pages
What the engines find when they arrive, and where to get published.
Your site
What the engines find on Mailchimp's own pages
Mechanical checks from reading 4 pages of your site: no judgment, just what a crawler sees.
- Structured data (ld+json)
- Organization, Service, WebPage
- llms.txt
- present
- Homepage title
- “Email & SMS Marketing Platform | Mailchimp”names your offer or area
The site audit you ordered: we read 5 pages of your own site and checked them against the core buyer questions this scan asked. Every finding below quotes the evidence it stands on; nothing is scored, guessed or padded.
Why it is not getting cited
What keeps the engines from reading, trusting and lifting answers from these pages.
Structured data lacks FAQPage
Evidence: ld+json present (Organization, Service, WebPage) but no FAQPage block on any of the 5 pages
Add the missing block types; FAQ and Service markup are what map your pages onto the questions buyers ask.
- yourself
- Free: extend the existing JSON-LD, the hard part is done.
No page answers the questions buyers ask
Evidence: none of the 5 pages answers any of the 12 buyer questions this scan asked; the page headings are 'Industries and Solutions', 'Integrations', 'Most Popular', 'Most Popular', 'Resources', 'Account'
Publish one plain page per question, answering it in the words a buyer uses; that page is the raw material engines lift answers from.
- yourself
- Free: the full question list is in this report.
No dated content anywhere
Evidence: no dates or time elements found on any of the 5 pages
Engines favour sites that show signs of life; date your work and publish something with a date on it.
- yourself
- Free: dated posts, dated portfolio entries, a changelog.
Why it is not converting
What loses the visitors who do arrive, judged from the pages' own text.
A stranger cannot tell what you do from the first screen
Evidence: the homepage opens with 'Email & SMS Marketing Platform | Mailchimp'
No H1 or opening body text is present in the extracted homepage content—only navigation menu items and a title tag, so a stranger cannot tell what is offered or where it operates from this content alone.
- yourself
- Free: one headline edit.
Competing calls to action
Evidence: the pages ask for several next steps at equal weight: Log In Sign Up ... Pricing ... Switch to Mailchimp
Multiple equally-weighted asks (Sign Up, Log In, Pricing, Switch to Mailchimp, Get started today) compete without a single clear primary action.
- yourself
- Free: styling and placement, no new content.
Trust signals are missing
Evidence: not found in the text of any fetched page: customer reviews or testimonials, credentials or awards; present: real contact details
Add the missing proof: named customer reviews, credentials, and a phone number or email a visitor can actually use.
- yourself
- Free: you already have the reviews and credentials, publish them.
Dead weight: Repeated duplicate navigation menu structure with no buyer content
Evidence: 'Main Menu Close Main Menu Main Menu'
Cut it; every screen a buyer scrolls past costs attention.
- yourself
- Free: deletion.
Dead weight: Language switcher list with no buyer-relevant information
Evidence: 'EN EN English ES Español FR Français BR Português DE Deutsch IT Italiano'
Cut it; every screen a buyer scrolls past costs attention.
- yourself
- Free: deletion.
Your target list
Where to get published, in order
The cited domains of your niche, ranked by how hard they pull the answers: raw citations plus how often they travel with the winners' picks. Your own domain and the winners' own sites are excluded, so everything here is ground you can earn.
| # | Domain | Citations | Backs the winners |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | emailtooltester.com | 55 | Klaviyo, Brevo, ActiveCampaign |
| 2 | emailvendorselection.com | 45 | Klaviyo, Brevo, MailerLite |
| 3 | sequenzy.com | 42 | MailerLite |
| 4 | ventureharbour.com | 30 | ActiveCampaign |
| 5 | reddit.com | 36 | — |
| 6 | insiderone.com | 26 | — |
| 7 | sender.net | 26 | — |
| 8 | zapier.com | 20 | — |
| 9 | mailtrap.io | 17 | — |
| 10 | learn.g2.com | 13 | — |
Beyond the AIs
The signals feeding the machines
AI answers are assembled from the wider web, so presence outside the engines matters too. A dash means the check could not run, never that the answer is no.
| Name | Wikipedia page | Google autocomplete | Searched with |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mailchimp (you) | Yes | 10 suggestions | alternatives, pricing |
| Klaviyo | Yes | 10 suggestions | email pricing |
| Brevo | Yes | 10 suggestions | alternatives, pricing |
| ActiveCampaign | Yes | 10 suggestions | — |
Demand signals
What this market is asking for
Where buyer questions show demand that nobody, you included, is clearly answering: candidate services and products to develop or make explicit, each grounded in this scan's own data.
a dedicated agency/multi-client management offering for marketing agencies handling multiple client accounts
Evidence: the buyer question 'what email marketing tool should marketing agencies use for clients' appears in the scan but no agency-specific offer or specialty is listed on Mailchimp's site
First step: publish a landing page outlining a multi-client workspace or agency plan and test search interest via that page's traffic
a nonprofit-tailored email and sms marketing plan with nonprofit pricing
Evidence: the question 'best email marketing platform for nonprofits' was asked in the scan yet nonprofits are not mentioned among Mailchimp's specialties or offers
First step: create a nonprofit pricing tier page and see if it captures nonprofit-related search and question traffic
a transparent, comparison-style pricing hub directly addressing Mailchimp vs Klaviyo and Brevo pricing
Evidence: autocomplete shows heavy demand for 'Mailchimp pricing', 'Mailchimp alternatives', 'Klaviyo email pricing', and 'Brevo pricing/alternatives', and the buyer question 'Mailchimp vs Klaviyo for ecommerce' appears unanswered with no clear recommendation
First step: build a side-by-side pricing/feature comparison page targeting these exact autocomplete terms and monitor engagement
a clearly marketed free or low-cost starter plan positioned for solopreneurs and very small businesses
Evidence: buyer questions 'best free email marketing platform for small business' and 'best email marketing tool for solopreneurs' appear in the scan but no free tier or solopreneur-specific specialty is listed on Mailchimp's site
First step: add a solopreneur-focused free-plan landing page and track signups from that segment over one month
Chapter five
What to do
Ordered by what moves the number, with the evidence behind each one.
The plan
6 actions, ordered. 2 you can do this week.
Generated from this scan's own data: the exact domains, questions and gaps above, ordered by expected impact. Every action names its specifics; each carries an honest effort tag. All of it is yours to do without us.
01
Publish a dedicated page titled 'Is Mailchimp Worth It for a Small Business?' answering directly with pricing, features, and limitations.
why('is Mailchimp worth it for a small business') already gets Mailchimp recommended on 5 of 8 engines (Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama) but mailchimp.com is only cited as a source on Perplexity out of those 5 - the other 4 engines answer without pointing to the buyer's own site.
DIY · a day or two02
Publish a comparison page titled 'Mailchimp vs Klaviyo for Ecommerce' with a clear feature/price table addressing.
why('Mailchimp vs Klaviyo for ecommerce') has Mailchimp recommended on 7 of 8 engines but it loses the head-to-head to Klaviyo (8 vs 7 picks) and mailchimp.com is cited only once (Perplexity) across those 7 recommending engines.
DIY · a day or two03
Publish a page titled 'Best Email Marketing Software for Ecommerce Stores' covering automation, segmentation, and integrations to target.
why('best email marketing software for ecommerce stores') is a question Mailchimp is recommended on 4 engines (Claude, Gemini, Mistral, Llama) for, but mailchimp.com is cited zero times on this question, while Klaviyo and Omnisend win it outright (8 picks each).
DIY · a day or two04
Add an FAQPage ld+json block to the site covering the exact wording of, and ('best free email marketing platform for small business').
whyThe site audit found ld+json types limited to Organization, Service, WebPage with no FAQPage block on any of the 5 crawled pages, and a few core buyer questions are answered anywhere on the site.
DIY · under an hour05
Pursue inclusion or an updated listing on emailtooltester.com (55 citations across Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini) and emailvendorselection.com (45 citations across Claude, Perplexity, Grok).
whyThese two domains are the single most-cited sources in the entire scan, well above mailchimp.com's own 35 citations, and appear on questions like, and where Mailchimp is recommended but its own domain is never cited.
needs help06
Rewrite the homepage opening from 'Email & SMS Marketing Platform | Mailchimp' to a single clear value statement and reduce the competing calls to action ('Log In', 'Sign Up', 'Pricing', 'Switch to Mailchimp') to one primary CTA.
whyThe site audit flagged that a stranger cannot tell what the business does from the first screen and that several next steps compete at equal weight on the same pages.
DIY · under an hour
How to read the forecasts
Each expected result is a conditional estimate based on published experiments and large-scale studies of what AI engines cite, not a promise of placement. The engines are third parties: they choose their own sources, change their models without notice, and refresh their indexes on their own schedule. Two things outside our control set the timing. First, re-crawling and indexing, which can take anywhere from hours to several weeks. Second, whether an answer comes from live retrieval, which updates quickly once a page is indexed, or from a model's trained memory, which only updates when that model is retrained months later. We optimize the inputs the evidence supports; the engines make the final call.
The checkpoint
This report is dated August 21, 2026.
Most of these 6 actions change numbers that only a second scan can show you. Tracking is this exact scan, re-run every week under this same link, with the leaderboard trended, the source map diffed, and an email when something material moves. Every run includes the site audit.
Methodology
The question set
A standardized panel of buyer questions for your market, put to every engine identically, phrased the way buyers actually ask. The panel rotates between scans so results stay representative and cannot be optimized against.
Core questions (12)
- best email marketing platform for small businesses
- best email marketing software for ecommerce stores
- who should I use for email and sms marketing as a small business
- best email marketing tool for solopreneurs
- is Mailchimp worth it for a small business
- best email marketing platform for nonprofits
- Mailchimp vs Klaviyo for ecommerce
- best ai-powered email marketing tool
- best email marketing software for startups
- what email marketing tool should marketing agencies use for clients
- best free email marketing platform for small business
- best email marketing automation tool for beginners
Discovery probes (13)
- best email marketing tool with built-in sms marketing
- best ai marketing tools for automating email campaigns
- best email platform for ecommerce marketing automations
- best tool for building conversion funnels with email marketing
- best email marketing software with behavioral data segmentation
- best marketing automation platform for audience segmentation
- best email marketing tool for small business on a tight budget
- best all-in-one platform for email marketing and social media marketing
- best email marketing tool with lead generation features
- best reporting and analytics tool for email campaigns
- best email marketing platform with easy onboarding for beginners
- best email marketing tool for content creation and campaigns
- best email marketing software to improve roi for small business
One re-run included.
If these questions missed how your customers actually ask, reply to your report email with adjusted questions within 7 days and we run it again free. Same link, new numbers, marked as a re-run.
How this was measured
- Question set
- Buyer-intent, rotating · English
- Engines
- 8 · ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral, Llama (Meta AI)
- Coverage
- 200 live AI answers
- Web search
- Live, on every question
- Run date
- August 21, 2026
- Niche
- email marketing platforms
The AI Visibility Score blends four measured rates: how often the engines pick you (weighted heaviest), how often they mention you, your share of all recommendations, and the tone when you are named. When too few answers name you to judge tone, the other three carry the score.
Each question was asked once per engine with live web search enabled, the way the consumer apps answer, and every cited source URL was captured. Answers where an engine's search variant failed fell back to a plain call and are counted honestly outside the search-enabled number.
Sampling honesty: AI answers vary run to run, so your recommendation rate is best read as a range: 62% of analysed answers, and a re-run should land between 55.1% and 68.4% (19 times out of 20). To measure stability, a subset of questions was asked twice on every engine: the two passes returned the same recommendation set 22% of the time. Single runs are snapshots; treat trends, not ticks, as the signal.
Methodology
Automated scan, run August 21, 2026. A standardized set of real buyer questions for email marketing platforms, written in English, held constant within a scan period and rotated over time so results stay comparable and resistant to gaming, each asked with a neutral system prompt and live web search enabled, the way the consumer apps answer, across ChatGPT (gpt-5.2), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Perplexity (sonar), Grok (grok-4-latest), Gemini (openrouter/google/gemini-2.5-flash), DeepSeek (deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1), Mistral (mistralai/mistral-large-2512), Llama (Meta AI) (meta-llama/llama-4-maverick). Every answer was captured live at scan time and classified for which names were mentioned and which were recommended; cited counts come from the source URLs each engine returned with its answer, matched to each entity's own domain. Counts are per answer; an engine naming a business twice in one answer counts once. Winner findings are counted co-occurrence within this run, not causation. We sell no placement, ranking or remediation, so a score cannot be bought. No human reviewed this report before delivery, and small niches can swing between runs; if a figure looks wrong, reply to your report email and we will re-check it.
To tailor the questions, the scan read 4 pages of Mailchimp's own site and extracted only what the site itself says: email marketing, email & sms marketing, ecommerce marketing automations, ai-powered marketing. Nothing beyond the site's own words was assumed.
If you want this done with you rather than by you: the human-written AI Visibility Report ($1,990) reads your pages one by one, and the sprint ($2,990, report included) implements the plan on your site. Your scan payment is credited toward either in full; reply to your report email. That is the only pitch in this report.